LugerForum Discussion Forums

LugerForum Discussion Forums (https://forum.lugerforum.com/index.php)
-   Early Lugers (1900-1906) (https://forum.lugerforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=121)
-   -   1906 vs 1908 (https://forum.lugerforum.com/showthread.php?t=38130)

DonVoigt 01-18-2018 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl (Post 312694)
I think "cannon" has value as a term for referring collectively to the barrel, receiver, toggle assembly, sear bar. It there another term used in Luger literature for this?

KFS

I call the assembled receiver as you describe it the "upper"; and the assembled frame with side plate the "lower". KISS.:cheers:

Ron Wood 01-18-2018 10:25 PM

I pretty much agree with Karl. I have always liked the term "cannon" as the collective description for the whole group that constitutes the "upper". It is simple and elegant.
Ron

Lugerdoc 01-19-2018 08:42 AM

Karl, if you were to include the ejector in your discription, i'd call it a luger "top half assy". TH

milesc2 01-22-2018 10:42 AM

Quick update for anyone else who may have my same question in the future:

I did have to shave down the rails as Karl suggested.
Before I did this the barrel extension would not travel fully into the frame.

I had to remove more than expected and it was not something I enjoyed doing!

So the answer to my original question is:

A 1906 receiver can be made to fit but if you have the option it is best to go with a 1908 spec part.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com