LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Lugerforum Archive

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 02-13-2001, 10:16 AM   #13
bcc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Just some clarification

At the risk of sounding too academic I would like to questiuon some of the terms that we tend to use (including myself) maybe we should think more about what we are saying.

First the term "shooter" has come to mean "non-collector grade", well I contend that ALL Lugers were built to be shooters, why else would a soldier be issued and trained on their use?

Second, "non-historical", often used to describe the current group of re-worked imports, well I have a hard time seeing what is non-historical about a pistol that was contracted by the German Military in WWII and by merit of it's country of origin was captured in some of the most epic battles in world history, (by the way these lugers are about the only ones we can tie to Eastern Front use), and then collected and refinished to go into storage for arms aide to communists movements during the 45 year Cold War. These Lugers may not be a perfectly preserved representation of the WWII finish condition but they are like living history of the Soviet Union for the last half of the 20th century.



 
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com