![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#17 | |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
Quote:
They make some sense if one wanted to remove and re-install a barrel. Many witness markings do not align, neither were they struck at the same time with the same instrument on the flange and receiver. Some years back Dwight Gruber was doing a detailed study of the witness marks and what they might indicate, and when they were applied. I believe that in this case logic has little to do with the presence or absence of the witness mark. With some 40-50 ft lbs of torque applied to seat the barrel, I do not subscribe to the rotational torque from firing being able to "tighten" the barrel though. And what about the witness marks that don't align the other way? A puzzle for sure! Maybe Dwight will chime in with his idea or conclusion.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|