LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-23-2018, 08:53 AM   #1
dz
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 261
Thanks: 1
Thanked 56 Times in 40 Posts
Default

6269 was the one I looked at, I may have indicated the incorrect luger
dz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-23-2018, 09:19 AM   #2
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,980
Thanks: 2,079
Thanked 4,614 Times in 2,127 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dz View Post
6269 was the one I looked at, I may have indicated the incorrect luger
\\

6269 is not a known test number, although it falls within the accepted range of 6100-7100

it is not a Bannerman or a Clarke number.


ed
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com