![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mt. Vernon VA
Posts: 246
Thanks: 1,436
Thanked 119 Times in 76 Posts
|
Is it possible that the naval manufacturer or supplier of magazine parts was different than the Armies, and so the wood worker did them as he was taught? Or were all magazines and parts made by or subcontracted to the same manufacturer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,409
Thanks: 7,583
Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,398 Posts
|
David, although possible in the strictest sense, it is unlikely to the highest degree. As fastidious as the Germans were about specifications, any subcontractors were held to strict guidelines and configurations, so they did not produce things willy-nilly based on their whims! In systems with interchangeable parts, this is also important. My impression is that although holsters had many different makers, the parts for the guns themselves were produced mostly in-house. Precision rod stock for pins, carbon steel flat stock for springs, probably came from suppliers... I'd say Chris has made a good call on the situation. Geo. Anderson's observations and advice are very highly regarded, as well!
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|