Newbie With First Luger:

[DonVoigt]

If you are worried about the cost of a magazine, taking your magazine and luger to a 'smith will cost a lot more.

Better to clean every thing up , again- and then try. It didn't just all of a sudden become bent and
rough. And certainly the follower didn't damage the magazine body.

Yes the cartridges do seem at a sharper angle in the luger magazine, they have to be to match the angle of the grip to the barrel.

FRom your post # 83:
"Eagle over WaA66 Waffenamt proof" .

These are are the "66"s I refer to. You can't see the 66 part of the WAa66 very well in these
markings as shown in my pictures.

I really don't understand your comment about my "u" suffix pistol, you wrote about reading about s,t, and u suffix pistols. Of course my serial is different from yours, each pistol serial is unique to each individual pistol of that year and model!

[gvf]

Originally Posted by DonVoigt

If you are worried about the cost of a magazine, taking your magazine and luger to a 'smith will cost a lot more.

Better to clean every thing up , again- and then try. It didn't just all of a sudden become bent and
rough. And certainly the follower didn't damage the magazine body.

Yes the cartridges do seem at a sharper angle in the luger magazine, they have to be to match the angle of the grip to the barrel.

FRom your post # 83:
"Eagle over WaA66 Waffenamt proof" .

These are are the "66"s I refer to. You can't see the 66 part of the WAa66 very well in these
markings as shown in my pictures.

I really don't understand your comment about my "u" suffix pistol, you wrote about reading about s,t, and u suffix pistols. Of course my serial is different from yours, each pistol serial is unique to each individual pistol of that year and model!

I didn't know if by chance you were referring to my pistol, which has a different serial N.

Best
"gvf"