www.lugerforum.com Technical Info Production Info Table 3

cirelaw · 07-21-2015, 05:59 PM

In September 2000 Ralph published his little black book. Several pretty lugers and their historys are explored. Displayed is the 1893 Borchardt, 1900 Swiss, 1906 Portugese Navy, The Carlos I, 1900 American Eagle, 1902 Carbine, 1904 Navy, 1900 and 1906 Russian, 1902 Carbine Brief Case, P08.Baby luger, 32 cal. Prototype, Spandau, 1917 DWM Artillery, 1920 Reworks, Simson & Co Suhl, Vickers LTD, 1916 Dated Navy Luger,unit marked, Death Head of Totenkopfe, Mauser 1930-1942.Chrome Luger unit marked "L.Mg.22.Persion 4" and8" artillery. Prototype Persion cutaway.

Yoda · 07-21-2015, 07:17 PM

Ed:

After my father passed away, the Luger has been in my safe for over 25 years. When he was alive, I never thought to ask him its story.

I like you just assumed it was a Luger 30 because I could tell it definitely was not a 9 MM. So I got a box of Luger 30 and went out to shoot it. But the Luger 30 would not even chamber. So I went to a local part-time gunsmith to have him see why it wouldn’t chamber a round. He measured the barrel and told me it was probably a 32 ACP or some obsolete ammo. We looked through all his gun and ammo books and could not find any reference to a 32 ACP Luger or an obsolete ammo.

I bought some 32 ACP ammo and we fired 5 rounds. They chambered and extracted perfectly. I even have one of the spent cartridges around here somewhere.

So I tried to research it and could not find anything until I found the reference in the note on table 3. I talked with the gunsmith and he said the barrel did not look like it had a sleeve and the barrel looked proper and was proportionately tapered. He said it probably was not a prototype because of the serial number and that fabricating a one off Luger barrel in 32 ACP could not have been done cheaply.

My father was a collector, of sorts, guns, clocks, pocket watches, jewelry, etc. I believe he bought this gun in the late sixties in the Chicago area. Believe me, my father was cheap and would not have paid much for it. So it really does not make sense to me that someone would have gone to the trouble and expense, only to sell it to my father for probably under $100.

It is definitely a standard size Luger and not a baby Luger.

As for pictures, I tried but my hand is not very steady and the parts do not lend themselves to easy photos. I will try again.

It is a rather ordinary 100+ year old gun with checkered walnut grips. Although I now wonder if it is a rare item. Anyway, I am not going to fire it anymore and when I disassemble it, I do not force anything.

I live the midlands of SC (Columbia area). Do you know anyone nearby who is a Luger authority or expert that I could have look at the gun?

sheepherder · 07-22-2015, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda

So I got a box of Luger 30 and went out to shoot it. But the Luger 30 would not even chamber.

Quite interesting Luger. A bit off-topic, but I'll re-inburse you for that box of 7.65 ammunition that you have no use for.

Jones and Datig both mention 32ACP Lugers, but they provide no pics. Pics of yours are what we need - a pic of the chamber/bore would be good too.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-21-2015, 07:17 PM	#2
Yoda User Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 6 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Ed: After my father passed away, the Luger has been in my safe for over 25 years. When he was alive, I never thought to ask him its story. I like you just assumed it was a Luger 30 because I could tell it definitely was not a 9 MM. So I got a box of Luger 30 and went out to shoot it. But the Luger 30 would not even chamber. So I went to a local part-time gunsmith to have him see why it wouldn’t chamber a round. He measured the barrel and told me it was probably a 32 ACP or some obsolete ammo. We looked through all his gun and ammo books and could not find any reference to a 32 ACP Luger or an obsolete ammo. I bought some 32 ACP ammo and we fired 5 rounds. They chambered and extracted perfectly. I even have one of the spent cartridges around here somewhere. So I tried to research it and could not find anything until I found the reference in the note on table 3. I talked with the gunsmith and he said the barrel did not look like it had a sleeve and the barrel looked proper and was proportionately tapered. He said it probably was not a prototype because of the serial number and that fabricating a one off Luger barrel in 32 ACP could not have been done cheaply. My father was a collector, of sorts, guns, clocks, pocket watches, jewelry, etc. I believe he bought this gun in the late sixties in the Chicago area. Believe me, my father was cheap and would not have paid much for it. So it really does not make sense to me that someone would have gone to the trouble and expense, only to sell it to my father for probably under $100. It is definitely a standard size Luger and not a baby Luger. As for pictures, I tried but my hand is not very steady and the parts do not lend themselves to easy photos. I will try again. It is a rather ordinary 100+ year old gun with checkered walnut grips. Although I now wonder if it is a rare item. Anyway, I am not going to fire it anymore and when I disassemble it, I do not force anything. I live the midlands of SC (Columbia area). Do you know anyone nearby who is a Luger authority or expert that I could have look at the gun?