![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 64
Thanks: 14
Thanked 45 Times in 15 Posts
|
GT-
Based on my experience with the 6" barrel you made for my gun, the thicker barrel will raise the front sight high enough to work with an existing rear sight. You'll have to fiddle around to get the exact height you need. I found Brownell's sight blank for the 98 Mauser a good place to start. The dovetail is different, but that's what files are for. Go Team! John |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,541
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,743 Times in 1,020 Posts
|
Hi John, yes! that is our pre-project choice, the tall Brownells K98k square top blade... We are cutting the dovetails for a tight Luger original front sight, and will hand file the Mauser to fit. If it works out, then we will cut for a tight Mauser... very slight difference?....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 625
Thanks: 35
Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts
|
I dunno....1911 .45s have adjustable sights that hold up over thousands of rounds, and the velocity and G forces are all at once, in one direction....I'd think the "rolling" action of the rear toggle, would spread the forces over more of an area at a slower rate....then again, I'm no engineer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,541
Thanks: 1,342
Thanked 3,743 Times in 1,020 Posts
|
I'm not sure as well!? I've just noticed going from tight to loose??? ....
..... Like my dad used to say, "Son, it's not the long fall that kills you! It's the stop!" .......... ...GT...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|