![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Hi All,
Well, while we are at it, what are your opinions on the strength of the T-14 Nambu design, as it is always called "weak" by all of those armchair experts out there; you know, the same crowd that claims that lead bullets won't shoot straight out of a 9mm. Sieger |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
Quote:
I thought the opening at the rear under the cocking knob was odd; and the inability to get a feeler gauge in the receiver to measure headspace is annoying...It's also somewhat distracting to pull the trigger and see the trigger bar emerging from the bottom of the receiver... ![]() I was particularly interested in the barrel itself, and the almost exact similarity to the 120mm 30 cal Luger 'pencil' barrel...I am tempted to try to find an old shot-out Nambu barrel/extension and drill & tap it for a 30 Luger 'pencil' barrel...
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't know what the armchair experts were commenting on, but a WAG would be the lockup, specifically, the locking block. The Nambu is a much heavier pistol than a Luger, and its parts don't look weakly designed to me. Your thoughts? Sieger |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| blivet |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|