1900 broken toggle lock ?

[Karl]

Since the toggle lock is borrowed directly from the Borchardt (like many other elements) perhaps it was necessary on the Borchardt but turned out to be unnecessary on the 1900.
KFS

[ithacaartist]

Originally Posted by Karl

Since the toggle lock is borrowed directly from the Borchardt (like many other elements) perhaps it was necessary on the Borchardt but turned out to be unnecessary on the 1900.
KFS

I think this turned out to be the case.

BTW, there's a thread from not too long ago where a couple members were measuring the force needed to open the action fully. It was in the realm of attempting to discover if a spring was weak, and I don't remember if a 1900 was tested. There would definitely be some mechanical difference with the bell cranks of different arm length, the two styles/strength of spring, and the different masses of the toggle trains, 1900 v. 1906. However, I'm wondering if all the variables would simply work out the same when comparing a 1900 to a 1906, each of .30 Luger, i.e. the total opening force, and then force available to return to battery. A strong spring acting a short arm may be the same as a weaker spring acting on a longer arm-- same torque. One may need to account for speed in this equation, in accord with the different distances from the fulcrum.