LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-22-2012, 03:14 PM   #1
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,123
Thanked 5,287 Times in 1,728 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saab-bob View Post
Ron
Is the different grip angle a attempt to make the .45 ACP version feed better?
My guess is that the actual gun used in the test trials was a tool room prototype made for the trials and followed the same grip angle as standard Lugers. The later pistols (presumably brought for back up to the test piece) I believe were more a marketing ploy. The sharper grip angle made it look more like the Colt, pehaps giving it more appeal to the US military, and may have been an attempt to influence the purchase of additional Lugers. Judging from the firing results of the .45 Luger test piece and more modern firing of the Aberman and Norton guns lead me to believe that both grip angles were successfully engineered to feed and function reliably.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Ron Wood for your post:
Unread 02-22-2012, 10:58 PM   #2
LugerMan.com
User
 
LugerMan.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 377
Thanks: 91
Thanked 364 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Wood View Post
My guess is that the actual gun used in the test trials was a tool room prototype made for the trials and followed the same grip angle as standard Lugers. The later pistols (presumably brought for back up to the test piece) I believe were more a marketing ploy. The sharper grip angle made it look more like the Colt, pehaps giving it more appeal to the US military, and may have been an attempt to influence the purchase of additional Lugers. Judging from the firing results of the .45 Luger test piece and more modern firing of the Aberman and Norton guns lead me to believe that both grip angles were successfully engineered to feed and function reliably.
I am going to tool up for a a 45 GAP conversion.

That way i retain a 55 degree angle everyone holds so dear,
and keep the price tag at 3000 and get a 45 caliber out of it.

Will see how well that starts moving.

And then after i learn my lessons , i will move in to 1907 model.

I really do not want to venture in a 200K project without some support from the world.

But i will keep thinking about it and moving in that direction.
LugerMan.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com