![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: CT. USA
Posts: 66
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Nice gun! I believe it is a "p" block/suffix not "n". The tail is missing from the stamp. I would say the mag is incorrect.
Cheers, Jason |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
That has crossed my mind but I find that the p and this n are some what different or at least the p on my byf differs from this n suffix style. Here are two photos one is the 41-42 the other is a 41 byf.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 58
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Hear are some better close ups of the two different suffixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 544
Thanks: 120
Thanked 383 Times in 158 Posts
|
Chris,
The style of the n suffix was different when comparing the magazine and the frame in 1941. Go to page 654 in The Mauser Parabellum and you will see your magazine matches as the book photos are from magazines. Here is a picture of another matching 41-42. I got faked out on this a while back in a discussion on Jan Stills Forum. It looks to me you have a very nice gun. Also notice the "3"s are flat top on the magazines and rounded on the front of the frame. Tom |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|