![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 166 Times in 87 Posts
|
Fenian, I think you did okay, now get a nice magazine (without chips).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: york co., va
Posts: 159
Thanks: 28
Thanked 42 Times in 24 Posts
|
Just curious, but shouldn't there be bore dimensions on the underside of the barrel? Or did they stop stamping these dimensions in the later part of '41. I know on the few 'byf' '41s I've been able to examine, they all had these dimensions.
Just trying to fill in blanks. Thanks, barr |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scottsboro, Alabama
Posts: 552
Thanks: 567
Thanked 449 Times in 170 Posts
|
See Frank's survey. Some have the bore dimensions and some don't. Mine does not have them.
Neil Young
__________________
Neil The hurrier I go the behinder I get. Sometimes it takes me all day to get nothing done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 166 Times in 87 Posts
|
barr, the bore gage marking was eliminated at about the midway point of the d suffix range.
BTW, thanks for all those that provided data for this point of information!!! ![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|