![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: California
Posts: 63
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Remember that the strength of the spring is a critical factor. GT is currently working my two replacement mags over because it turned out that they give me more jams than the original magazine. It turns out that the springs are much weaker than the original ones. This may be because I have a1970s Luger. I heard that the springs there are stronger than in the old ones. If you encounter problems with the mag, you should try to replace the springs, that's what we are currently working on with my magazines
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
Yes, the later Mauser Parabellums were designed to fire the hotter modern ammo, and, thus, a stronger magazine spring is necessary to catch-up with the additional speed of recoil of the toggle. In my opinion, the later Mauser springs are an ideal, all around spring for just about any application with a Luger, as too strong is ok but too weak means a jam. G.T. will come up with the right "formula" believe me. ![]() Sieger |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|