![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,051
Thanks: 1,123
Thanked 5,287 Times in 1,728 Posts
|
Not that I am disagreeing, but I would need a lot clearer photo of 38XX to state for sure that the die is broken. The vertical lines, such as the curved sides of the shield, are much less distinct due to the oblique lighting. If I blow the image up and exercise my imagination (
) I can almost convince myself that the sides of the crown are there. Note the "washed out" right side of the crown on #866 due to the angle and the lighting.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
Ron
Its fine to challenge my theory I do think the die is broken and separated across the top. The data is very sparse but at least the theory is based on data and not grabbed from mid air. Vern |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL and PA
Posts: 332
Thanks: 276
Thanked 243 Times in 109 Posts
|
I made a follow-up post to this inquiry over on the other Luger Forum if anyone would like to clarify or contribute.
Looking for clarification as to what LugerVern thought was broken and in which images. http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...an-crest-study |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|