upload photo | donate | calendar
|
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
07-05-2001, 06:25 PM
|
#11 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calion, Arkansas
Posts: 1,042
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: But the ? is still why one digit higher?
As explained, the number wasn't changed to one number higher until 1939, and this date is not written in stone but just from observation. I have never seen any type of explaination, and what I said was pure conjecture. Obviously Mauser saw some reason for changing the number, but the true reason still remains to be found.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode