LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Shooting and Reloading

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 07-31-2002, 10:29 AM   #5
AGE
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 597
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Guys,

The reason that I thought it might be possible to use a short barreled .44 underwater is that a barrel full of water would weigh less than a 300 gr. bullet now commonly used in .44s. Perhaps a 180 grain mild load would function without pressure problems.

However, water is incompressible, shock waves are generated, etc. etc. We all have heard of problems shooting rifles with bore obstructions--? Anyway I wonder. Surely this has been tried by somebody. I had hoped one of our members might know.

Now then, perhaps the concussion would cause severe problems to the shooter. Also, penetration shooting into water isn't great (probably less that 4 feet or so) from what I've read so maybe the gun would be useless.
__________________
Al Eggers (AGE) NRA Life Member
AGE is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com