LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Shooting and Reloading

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 07-23-2003, 04:30 PM   #8
unspellable
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 769
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts
Post

Sieger,

I had the 9 mm truncated cone lead bullet loads put up some time ago, before I really got into the what's, why's, and how's of loading for the Luger. They didn't work well so set them aside and haven't paid any attention to them since. I'll drag a few out and see what the OAL is. However, I think the bullet profile is more likely to be the culprit than the OAL. As I say, the profile does not match the original DWM load. They did feed OK in a Ruger P89.

I have acquired a revolver chambered for the 9 mm Parabellum that I can burn non-feeding rounds in. Now if only I had a revolver chambered for the 7.65 mm Parabellum to use up all that underloaded factrory ammo. I acquired a Ruger P89 in 7.65 mm Parabellum with a reduced recoil spring but it will not reliably feed Winchester of Fiocchi ammo. Did OK with a box of Peters, although ejection was not very enthusiastic.
unspellable is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com