More Ku 's

John D. · 10-07-2003, 07:40 PM

Hi Hugh,

I've never seen a KU below 3 digits. Further, it appears to me, based on Gibson's reference and updated information since that publication, that the KU "production" spanned a number of toggles/chamber dated marks - but serialization was fairly consistient.

I'm not convinced that of evidence doesn't point to something more conclusive about KU and their manufacturing/production mystery....

Anyway - 1834 would cerainly be lower, but is the KU a prefix or suffix to that number??? Any photos??!

Best to you!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

10-07-2003, 07:40 PM	#6
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 478 Thanked 517 Times in 129 Posts	Hi Hugh, I've never seen a KU below 3 digits. Further, it appears to me, based on Gibson's reference and updated information since that publication, that the KU "production" spanned a number of toggles/chamber dated marks - but serialization was fairly consistient. I'm not convinced that of evidence doesn't point to something more conclusive about KU and their manufacturing/production mystery.... Anyway - 1834 would cerainly be lower, but is the KU a prefix or suffix to that number??? Any photos??! Best to you!