LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-27-2022, 12:39 PM   #1
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,753
Thanks: 845
Thanked 1,826 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yakman View Post
If it were illegal to remove an import mark, it would seem one could not remove and replace a barrel, for example, if the mark were placed on that barrel. Jack
Excellent point. I have a post-WW1 rework of an Erfurt military pistol. The date was scrubbed and a new .30 caliber barrel installed. Other than the barrel, it's all matching. CAI put their import markings on the underside of the barrel.

Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2022, 07:28 AM   #2
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubs View Post
Excellent point. I have a post-WW1 rework of an Erfurt military pistol. The date was scrubbed and a new .30 caliber barrel installed. Other than the barrel, it's all matching. CAI put their import markings on the underside of the barrel.

almost definitely barreled by Century overseas before importation - common practice with them if the work could be done cheaper in some foreign countries -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2022, 10:41 AM   #3
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,753
Thanks: 845
Thanked 1,826 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
almost definitely barreled by Century overseas before importation - common practice with them if the work could be done cheaper in some foreign countries -
I disagree. The rework was done post-WW1 - 1920's - and sold somewhere in Europe as there is no "Germany" stamp. The barrel is far from having been recently installed. The poorly stamped "M23" suggests that it was imported from Finland where it may have been sold commercially.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 07:20 AM   #4
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

used barrel installed before import - Finns were famous for cannibalizing captured foreign pistols + rifles for reissue - you neglected to mention connection wit Finland in your post -post WWI when Finland became independent they acquired large quantities of German pistols including c96 mausers + p08 lugers - in 1923 they standardized them all to 7.65 luger [ broomhandles included ] - Century imported them in late 80's + early 90's - the extremely rare ones are the P08's purchased direct from DWM in 1923 in 7.65 -

Last edited by schutzen-jager; 05-29-2022 at 09:10 AM. Reason: spellin -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 12:41 PM   #5
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,753
Thanks: 845
Thanked 1,826 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
used barrel installed before import - Finns were famous for cannibalizing captured foreign pistols + rifles for reissue - you neglected to mention connection wit Finland in your post -post WWI when Finland became independent they acquired large quantities of German pistols including c96 mausers + p08 lugers - in 1923 they standardized them all to 7.65 luger [ broomhandles included ] - Century imported them in late 80's + early 90's - the extremely rare ones are the P08's purchased direct from DWM in 1923 in 7.65 -
Why would I mention Finland in my original post? They had nothing to do with the import marking on the barrel and the discussion was about import stamps.

Exactly on what "facts" are you basing your conclusions? You're making a lot of claims without proof. There's no way to prove who replaced the barrel or when but thousands of Lugers were re-barreled to 30 caliber with new barrels in the 1920's for sale on the commercial market and that is the most likely explanation.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Unread 05-29-2022, 03:36 PM   #6
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doubs View Post
Why would I mention Finland in my original post? They had nothing to do with the import marking on the barrel and the discussion was about import stamps.

Exactly on what "facts" are you basing your conclusions? You're making a lot of claims without proof. There's no way to prove who replaced the barrel or when but thousands of Lugers were re-barreled to 30 caliber with new barrels in the 1920's for sale on the commercial market and that is the most likely explanation.
try doing a little research before making definitive statements - try the books by Walter , Hoffschmidt , Berger + others - also search the 1988 + later catalogs published by Century arms - the 1920's barrels were manufactured in Finland by both Sako + Tikka - the small CAI above the faint Finn markings prove that barrel was replaced before import + size + content of import marks are consistant with late 80's early 90's import -
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-29-2022, 05:20 PM   #7
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,753
Thanks: 845
Thanked 1,826 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schutzen-jager View Post
the 1920's barrels were manufactured in Finland by both Sako + Tikka - the small CAI above the faint Finn markings prove that barrel was replaced before import
First you claim it was "almost definitely" replaced by CAI before import.

Then you claim it was a used barrel when replaced. If the Finns replaced the barrel, it would have been new.

Skipping your uncalled for insults about research, of course the barrel was replaced before import... but WHEN? It's an Imperial Erfurt Luger from 1917 or 1918.

"Faint Finn markings"? WHERE, exactly? No such thing on that barrel. It has only the marks put there by CAI. In the 1990's, CAI imported Lugers from many places with Finland being but one country they came from.

As the Finns didn't adopt the Luger in 30 caliber before 1923 and Germany was prohibited from providing 9mm Lugers at that time - the reason Finland went with 30 caliber to begin with - why is it more likely that the Finns did the re-barrel than the Germans? The CAI stamp is the ONLY about the pistol to even suggest it was ever in Finland.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 3 members says Thank You to Doubs for your post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com