![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Kurusu,
Perhaps. I've "read" this too, somewhere, but have never been able to verify it. Can an expert here verify this claim, through an actual, physical chamber examination of a byf 42? Also, I haven't been able to locate any original German text documentation supporting this. Thanks! Sieger |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
Quote:
A friend of mine (retired militay) has one of our contract byf 42s (n block). It has conic chambers and it has never been messed with. |
|
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to kurusu for your post: |
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,992 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Mauser worked on a request by the army and developed a hand reamer for the job. But since the P08 was already near the end of production in 1942, not much importance was given to the project.
Factory documents on the subject did survive. Portuguese 5012m also has no step. |
|
|
|
| The following 3 members says Thank You to Vlim for your post: |
|
|
#4 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
A hand reamer would seem to indicate a field modification, not a change in factory barrel design modification. Your thoughts? Sieger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Merritt Island, Fl
Posts: 952
Thanks: 778
Thanked 528 Times in 290 Posts
|
I don't pretend to know the square root of eff all about this subject, but two pages and I have yet to hear any concrete reason as to why the OP's ammo would be harmful to a Luger, or any other gun. All I'm reading here is FUD - come on guys, we can do better than this.
|
|
|
|
| The following 2 members says Thank You to Zorba for your post: |
|
|
#9 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
Breach block slap. Sieger |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|