Borchardt-Luger Controversy

Kyrie · 08-18-2002, 04:39 PM

Hi Unspellable!

IÃ¢??d disagree only with your terminology :-)

Seriously, and in the interests of clarity and of comradeship, may I suggest we use the terminology from the Ã¢??Parts and DisassemblyÃ¢?Â page on this Forum? I think we may both disagree with the terminology used there, but that terminology has the advantage being easily accessible to all, and is complete with a parts diagram so folks who havenÃ¢??t spent a lot of time inside a Luger can at least see which parts are being discussed.

Just a suggestion :-)

Warm regards,

Kyrie
Moderator - Cruffler_Forum on Yahoo Groups
"The flame free C&R Forum."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

08-18-2002, 04:39 PM	#1
Kyrie User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 757 Thanks: 0 Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts	Hi Unspellable! IÃ¢??d disagree only with your terminology :-) Seriously, and in the interests of clarity and of comradeship, may I suggest we use the terminology from the Ã¢??Parts and DisassemblyÃ¢?Â page on this Forum? I think we may both disagree with the terminology used there, but that terminology has the advantage being easily accessible to all, and is complete with a parts diagram so folks who havenÃ¢??t spent a lot of time inside a Luger can at least see which parts are being discussed. Just a suggestion :-) Warm regards, Kyrie Moderator - Cruffler_Forum on Yahoo Groups "The flame free C&R Forum."