![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 206
Thanks: 1
Thanked 102 Times in 47 Posts
|
Your marking appears to be for the Polizeischule Hannover if the pistol is a police pistol. If it is a police pistol it should have a sear safety on the left side. A photograph or two would help identify it precisely.
__________________
"You can't please everyone, so you have got to please yourself." Ricky Nelson |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
Thanks for the insight. No sear safety present and no evidence of ever having had a sear safety installed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
Sorry, no pics right now - technical difficulties (e.g., discharged camera battery) at this end.
Since you have drawn my attention to it, the sear bar does look to be different from every other luger against which I compare it. Namely, the upward-angled portion of the sear bar is immediately adjacent to the safety bar when the safety lever is moved to "gesichert." On every other luger against which I compare it, there is a space or gap between the safety lever and the corresponding section of the sear bar. Sounds like this may have a Schmidt safety? (yes, I know, pictures would help confirm) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Andrew, It sounds like your gun is an early 1916 DWM, these had unrelieved sear bars, Later in 1916, and from then onwards, sear bars were relieved (shortened).
Regards, Norm |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|