![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Regarding the 90 on the barrel, Aaron made a big deal about whether or not something was stamped then blued, or vice-versa. This looks to me like it was stamped, then blued. The finish on the gun seems to match. But I guess the killers are the sights not matching up to something production. Does anyone know if Luger ever made a front sight with a gold/brass inlay? It's about 1/4" long and the dot is tiny. I never even noticed it until I got it out in the sun yesterday to take pictures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,055
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 5,297 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
If you mean did the original manufacturer (DWM/BKIW) make such a front sight, the answer is no. It is an aftermarket sight.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,316
Thanks: 2,763
Thanked 1,000 Times in 735 Posts
|
I also am a reloader. I believe that you will find that minimum powder loads in 9mm will not cycle the toggle. Of course, a lot depends on what mainspring your Luger has installed. I might suggest starting at mid level of powder, then go 0.1gr both up and down, to see which way works the best. Most Luger reloaders strive for a load that is accurate, and the least powder and still have it function 100%. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|