Opinions on Navy rig (no pistol)

[lugerholsterrepair]

Clifton.. Norm..the magazine also is not Imperial Navy..I see a crown M on the left
side...?? Maybe? Like norm says better photo's are in order. The body should not be blued and early Navy magazines had concentric rings..

I agree with Norm, the stock has some merit..Is there a serial number on the iron? It would likely have an "a" suffix if so..Is there a small Crown M on the steel disc?

The pebble grain double mag pouch is interesting..again I agree..need to see the back. Inside too.

The carry strap has some merit, I would like a photo of the belt clip with rivets? Also the holes on the strap? The adjustment studs too?

Does the loading tool have any markings?

Closeups of the wooden barrel on the cleaning rod? Barrel looks a tad fat for me but it could be the angle. The rod appears to be Artillery length not Navy.

I would like to see the bottom of the toe/wrist strap..It might be Navy..I cannot see an Artillery stud on top nor any rivets on the bottom, Is it sewn at the bottom?

[Norme]

Hi Jerry, Imperial Navy mags have large numbers running along the long axis, and tinned tubes, not blued, as you said. Both ringed bases, like the one shown, and the regular dished type are both proper.
Hi Clifton, How long is that rod? Regards, Norm

[CLIFTON]

I took more pics. The rod is 10' long