![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
|
Zamo
Its Christmas time, so I am going to try one more time to show you what is going on with your gun. Yes, that ownership marking on the rear of the frame is pretty cool stuff, but the gun has some issues. I see no less than 3 different styles of fonts on your gun, its a red flag, doesn't happen very often. DWM usually used a larger font on the side plate than on the take down lever and sear bar, the gun in question has all three the same. If your after a nice army Luger Ed has a pretty 1915 for sale on this forums WTS section, for about the same price. While your looking at it, look at the picture showing the take down, side plate and sear bar and compare it to yours. Don't take my word for it, look for yourself. I really do wish you and everyone else a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year Vern |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to LugerVern for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 142
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
Thanks for the Christmas advice Vern. None-the-less, being an optimist, a gambler, and sometimes a fool, I bought it.
![]() I'm in Washington state, and the seller is an antique shop in Connecticut, and as we here in the Puget Sound are covered in an unusual level of snow (Global warming, no doubt), it will be a couple weeks before I get my sweaty little mitts on it. However, rest assured, at that time I will post a SLEW of good pictures and we can lay some of these concerns to rest. I spoke with the seller on the telephone, and he addressed most of my concerns, and seemed knowledgable enough. He assured me that he has carefully examined the pistol with a jewelers rouge and there seems to be no evidence of serial number tampering. He is likewise convinced the finish is original. Words. Words are only that, and I will be the first to admit it, but his answers seemed informed, and his demeanor seemed earnest, and I have seen what .jpg artifacting can do to a picture when you compress it for posting on the internet. I think that this is the case in the photos shown earlier in this thread. Times are tough. My wife is out of work, and layoffs are all around me. In the grandest tradition, I therefor have no choice but to spend $1300 on a questionable Luger! Here are all the pictures I have of it, along with more inane banter and dialog: 1916 DWM pictures
__________________
<INSERT WITTY SAYING HERE> My collection: http://home.comcast.net/~gunspotz/guns.htm Last edited by Zamo; 12-24-2008 at 04:31 PM. Reason: Needed to point out the "Good Luck" of this being post 100! Cross your fingers for me! :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Looks great to me. What a very nice and good looking Luger. Congrats, plus I am glad for you that you decided to get it.
__________________
W David |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|