![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
George,
Nice example of a pre-1945 Erma 'Model 30' conversion kit. Here's one in use: |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I believe this small box 22 conversion was manufactured in mid 1937. I have fired it several times and I do have to attest they are nice to own, however they do not function with a dam. Granted the E/77 10 round magazine has a weak spring so I purchased a post war 22 conversion magazine with stronger spring and results were the same.
With only 30,000 made, I am very fortunate to own one. I was surprised many years ago to see that ever the spacer & nuts were proofed as well as all the other parts! George |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
|
Quote:
btw. spring is supposed to be a bit weak on these .22 mags.
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Steiner:
Many thanks for your response. Is your 22 conversion unit war time or post war? I have always heard good things regarding the post war units! I am aware that the ejector should be removed hence the slot in the wood box. My guess your unit is post war as I have never heard anything good regarding the function regarding these war time 22 conversions. Spring tension on post war magazines is about twice what my war time unit is and they are .22LR not .22 mag. George |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|