LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Luger Accessories

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-14-2008, 07:44 AM   #1
Vlim
Moderator
Lifetime
LugerForum Patron
 
Vlim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts
Default

George,

Nice example of a pre-1945 Erma 'Model 30' conversion kit.

Here's one in use:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg erma_big.jpg (35.9 KB, 79 views)
Vlim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-14-2008, 12:55 PM   #2
Mauser George
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I believe this small box 22 conversion was manufactured in mid 1937. I have fired it several times and I do have to attest they are nice to own, however they do not function with a dam. Granted the E/77 10 round magazine has a weak spring so I purchased a post war 22 conversion magazine with stronger spring and results were the same.

With only 30,000 made, I am very fortunate to own one. I was surprised many years ago to see that ever the spacer & nuts were proofed as well as all the other parts!

George
Mauser George is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-15-2008, 02:50 AM   #3
Steinar
User
 
Steinar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauser George View Post
I believe this small box 22 conversion was manufactured in mid 1937. I have fired it several times and I do have to attest they are nice to own, however they do not function with a dam. Granted the E/77 10 round magazine has a weak spring so I purchased a post war 22 conversion magazine with stronger spring and results were the same.
Lugerdoc here in the forum gave me the advice to remove the ejector before installing the set. Made mine function quite flawlessly, perhaps you have it installed?
btw. spring is supposed to be a bit weak on these .22 mags.
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane
Steinar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-15-2008, 07:03 AM   #4
Mauser George
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Steiner:

Many thanks for your response. Is your 22 conversion unit war time or post war?

I have always heard good things regarding the post war units! I am aware that the ejector should be removed hence the slot in the wood box.

My guess your unit is post war as I have never heard anything good regarding the function regarding these war time 22 conversions.

Spring tension on post war magazines is about twice what my war time unit is and they are .22LR not .22 mag.

George
Mauser George is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com