Navy Luger?

George Anderson · 08-27-2006, 08:41 AM

I think Dwight has said it all, the rear sight looks like a reproduction, the grip strap marking is very questionable, the Navy acceptance stampings are just plain weird on an army gun. The 1917 stampings are probably fake and the barrel as well.

Russell, if your gun budget is such that you must put this pistol on layaway it would indicate a sacrifice on your part. This pistol does not warrant such a sacrifice.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

08-27-2006, 08:41 AM	#19
George Anderson Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: VA Posts: 3,592 Thanks: 1,773 Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts	I think Dwight has said it all, the rear sight looks like a reproduction, the grip strap marking is very questionable, the Navy acceptance stampings are just plain weird on an army gun. The 1917 stampings are probably fake and the barrel as well. Russell, if your gun budget is such that you must put this pistol on layaway it would indicate a sacrifice on your part. This pistol does not warrant such a sacrifice.